Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Chileans

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,935,470 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.554% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 553.8 Chileans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Chilean Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $46,459, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $108,429, a difference of 50.2%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $90,605, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $53,185, a difference of 17.5%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,757, a difference of 22.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Fair
26.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 141.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 127.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 101.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 98.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 72.5%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 62.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
30.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 74.5%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 63.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamChilean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%