Egyptian vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Egyptians

Chileans

Excellent
Excellent
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Egyptian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,095,004 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Chileans.
Egyptian Integration in Chilean Communities

Egyptian vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $56,973, a difference of 7.2%), median earnings ($51,701 compared to $48,504, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $40,757, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $63,957, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.4%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Income
Income MetricEgyptianChilean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,358
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,119
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,673
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,701
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,095
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,305
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,444
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,282
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,256
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,441
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Fair
26.3%

Egyptian vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricEgyptianChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.0%

Egyptian vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEgyptianChilean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%

Egyptian vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.36%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEgyptianChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.4%

Egyptian vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 8.6%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEgyptianChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
30.7%

Egyptian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEgyptianChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Good
6.4%

Egyptian vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.1%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and associate's degree (50.9% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricEgyptianChilean
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.1%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Egyptian vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.76%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Egyptian vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricEgyptianChilean
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%