Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Grenada

Chileans

Poor
Excellent
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,367,495 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 45.8 Chileans.
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Chilean Communities

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 62.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $63,957, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $106,611, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $40,757, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $48,504, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,123
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,249
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,517
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,596
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,279
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,932
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,538
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,311
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,552
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,747
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.2%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.9%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
Poverty
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 46.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 40.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
67.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.0%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.5%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.1%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Good
30.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 278.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 133.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 116.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 43.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 95.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 116.7%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.5%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
62.7%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
28.7%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
9.1%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
2.7%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.5%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.3%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.7%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaChilean
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%