Blackfeet vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,934,900 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.330% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 329.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,509 compared to $90,605, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($37,695 compared to $46,459, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $106,611, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $40,757, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 23.6%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%).