Subsaharan African vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,335,894 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $99,900, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $106,611, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $90,605, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $40,757, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $48,504, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.6%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.0%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%).