Latvian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,452,202 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.737. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.837% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 836.8 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,459, a difference of 13.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $56,973, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $108,429, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.76%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $63,957, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.26%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.66%).