Comanche vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Chileans
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,491,278 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 23.5 Chileans.
Comanche vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $106,611, a difference of 24.3%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $90,605, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $108,429, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,757, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Comanche vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 35.1%), single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.6%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.0% |
Comanche vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.3% |
Comanche vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Comanche vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Good 30.7% |
Comanche vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.4% |
Comanche vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.8%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Comanche vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 11.3%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |