Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Chileans
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,026,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Chileans.
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,459, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $63,957, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $56,973, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $90,605, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $106,611, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($104,910 compared to $108,429, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,017 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,910 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,919 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,027 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,306 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,461 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,158 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,058 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,149 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,021 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Poverty Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.4% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.43 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Good 30.7% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.7%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 6.4% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.1% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |