Ecuadorian vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Chileans

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,783,842 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Chileans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Chilean Communities

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,957, a difference of 16.4%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,429, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,757, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,504, a difference of 7.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Income
Income MetricEcuadorianChilean
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Fair
26.3%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianChilean
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.0%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.8%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Good
30.7%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 130.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Good
6.4%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ecuadorian vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianChilean
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%