Ecuadorian vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chileans
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,783,842 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Chileans.
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,957, a difference of 16.4%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,429, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,757, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,504, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Fair 26.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Excellent 11.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.8%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Good 30.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 130.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Good 6.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Chilean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |