Immigrants from Australia vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,555,451 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.412% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 412.4 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $46,459, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $56,973, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $108,429, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $53,185, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $63,957, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%).