Alaska Native vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,953,410 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 12.5 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $46,459, a difference of 17.4%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $56,973, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $90,605, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $63,957, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $40,757, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 74.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.5%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.1%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 75.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 129.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.1%).