Yup'ik vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,438,436 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Chileans.
Yup'ik Integration in Chilean Communities

Yup'ik vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $46,459, a difference of 52.2%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $56,973, a difference of 44.2%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $108,429, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $63,957, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Income
Income MetricYup'ikChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Fair
26.3%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 197.5%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 170.9%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 165.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.9%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikChilean
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 255.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 228.8%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 225.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 80.0%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Good
5.3%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 142.9%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 84.0%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.8%), family households (72.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.3%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Good
30.7%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 364.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 60.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 54.3%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Good
6.4%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 112.1%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 98.2%), and associate's degree (25.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Yup'ik vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 253.2%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 103.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Yup'ik vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%