Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,906,065 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $56,973, a difference of 21.0%), median earnings ($57,114 compared to $48,504, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $90,605, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,185, a difference of 8.7%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $63,957, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 24.3%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.060%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.84%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.6%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.5%).