Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Immigrants from Latvia

Fair
Excellent
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,619,015 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 73.4 Immigrants from Latvia.
Shoshone Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $50,914, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $111,454, a difference of 33.3%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $114,826, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $51,737, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $64,298, a difference of 19.8%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
26.7%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.6%), and single male poverty (16.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.3%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.3%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.8%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
29.1%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.5%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 76.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.3%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 42.8%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%