Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Latvia
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,253,196 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 113.0 Immigrants from Latvia.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $50,914, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $61,422, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $51,555, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $64,298, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,737, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Exceptional $114,826 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Exceptional $93,602 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Exceptional $51,555 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Exceptional $61,422 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Exceptional $43,099 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Fair $51,737 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Exceptional $105,522 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Exceptional $111,454 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Exceptional $64,298 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.4%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.75%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.93%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.45%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Tragic 52.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 70.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Latvia |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |