Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,557,970 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 68.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $50,914, a difference of 35.0%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $114,826, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $61,422, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $51,737, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $43,099, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 84.0%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.2%), and receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.7%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%), no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 60.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.0%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.4%).