Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,169,424 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 31.7 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 65.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $111,454, a difference of 30.3%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $114,826, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $43,099, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $51,555, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 71.9%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.6%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 53.1%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 44.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 24.7%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 209.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 100.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 91.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 40.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 82.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 91.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.1%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.8%).