Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Belizeans

Immigrants from Latvia

Tragic
Excellent
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Belizean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,640,337 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Immigrants from Latvia.
Belizean Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,097 compared to $50,914, a difference of 30.2%), median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $61,422, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($90,880 compared to $114,826, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $43,099, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $64,298, a difference of 17.8%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,097
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,880
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,028
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,702
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,358
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,429
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,094
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,534
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,684
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,580
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
26.7%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.2%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.0%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.4%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Excellent
64.8%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.0%
Exceptional
29.1%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.7%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.0%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.6%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Belizean vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricBelizeanImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%