Slavic vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,507,944 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.801. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.233% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 233.4 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $50,914, a difference of 13.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $105,522, a difference of 9.5%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $114,826, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $51,737, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $64,298, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.1%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.18%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.11%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.1%).