Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,571,000 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($102,962 compared to $93,602, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($70,696 compared to $64,298, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $111,454, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($51,671 compared to $50,914, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($44,847 compared to $43,099, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.34%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.8%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%).