Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,325,284 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $50,914, a difference of 20.7%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $105,522, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $43,099, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $64,298, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.9%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).