Ugandan vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,229,422 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.856. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 93.9 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $50,914, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $61,422, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $64,298, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $43,099, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.4%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.85%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.8%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.93%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.32%).