Hmong vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,745,501 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.481% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 481.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $50,914, a difference of 33.6%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $61,422, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $111,454, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,737, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $64,298, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%).