Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Latvia
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,983,682 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 87.1 Immigrants from Latvia.
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $50,914, a difference of 16.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $43,099, a difference of 11.3%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $114,826, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,737, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,298, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Exceptional $114,826 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Exceptional $93,602 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Exceptional $51,555 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Exceptional $61,422 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Exceptional $43,099 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Fair $51,737 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Exceptional $105,522 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Exceptional $111,454 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Exceptional $64,298 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.54%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.2%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.21%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 54.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 52.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Exceptional 70.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |