Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pueblo

Immigrants from Latvia

Poor
Excellent
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Pueblo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,616,021 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 200.5 Immigrants from Latvia.
Pueblo Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,012 compared to $50,914, a difference of 59.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $105,522, a difference of 53.1%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $114,826, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $51,737, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $64,298, a difference of 21.5%), and wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 29.3%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,012
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,880
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$64,692
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,859
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,314
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,564
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,018
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$68,910
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,601
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,930
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
26.7%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 146.5%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 115.9%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 31.9%), single father poverty (21.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 34.5%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.2%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
10.3%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.7%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.4%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.6%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
83.4%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 84.3%), single father households (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (68.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.0%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.79
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
38.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
53.7%
Exceptional
29.1%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 56.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.6%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 85.4%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 76.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.4%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 53.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricPuebloImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.1%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.4%