Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,461,043 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.973. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.566% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 1,566.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $51,737, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $50,914, a difference of 7.2%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $114,826, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $43,099, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $64,298, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.2%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.51%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%).