Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,055,666 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 51.7 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $43,099, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $50,914, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $51,737, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $93,602, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $111,454, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (48.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and bachelor's degree (41.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.51%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.8%).