Immigrants from Cameroon vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,372,259 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Cameroon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cameroon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cameroon corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,334 compared to $50,914, a difference of 23.2%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,214 compared to $105,522, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,433 compared to $51,737, a difference of 0.59%), householder income over 65 years ($63,907 compared to $64,298, a difference of 0.61%), and median female earnings ($40,354 compared to $43,099, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.090%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.3%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.4%).