German Russian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,300,537 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.650% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 1,649.7 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $50,914, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $111,454, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,220 compared to $105,522, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $51,737, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $43,099, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.39%), family households (60.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.1%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%).