Cajun vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,183,488 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 195.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,527 compared to $50,914, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $111,454, a difference of 34.3%), and median household income ($70,605 compared to $93,602, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,338 compared to $51,737, a difference of 14.1%), median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $61,422, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($42,189 compared to $51,555, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.8%), single female poverty (30.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and single male poverty (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 59.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 40.7%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.77%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 43.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 73.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 73.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.5%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.4%).