Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Latvia

Poor
Excellent
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,023,568 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 75.1 Immigrants from Latvia.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $50,914, a difference of 75.4%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $114,826, a difference of 61.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $111,454, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.6%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,737, a difference of 22.1%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $43,099, a difference of 30.4%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
26.7%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.1%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 61.6%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 109.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 103.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.2%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 14.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 76.9%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (66.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.1%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.8%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.2%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
5.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 103.2%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 102.0%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 54.3%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.6%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%