Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Latvia

Poor
Excellent
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,221,165 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.953. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Immigrants from Latvia.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $50,914, a difference of 54.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $105,522, a difference of 38.4%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $114,826, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $64,298, a difference of 14.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
26.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 107.1%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 98.6%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and single male poverty (15.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
10.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 135.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 87.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Good
5.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 116.5%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 53.6%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
29.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 135.7%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 82.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 78.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
5.5%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 101.3%), no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 91.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and female disability (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%