Immigrants from Iraq vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,601,090 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,365 compared to $50,914, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,444 compared to $105,522, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($52,681 compared to $61,422, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($53,384 compared to $51,737, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,824 compared to $64,298, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 61.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%).