Burmese vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,274,435 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $64,298, a difference of 10.6%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $93,602, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $111,454, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,005 compared to $50,914, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $43,099, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.61%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.7%).