Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Immigrants from Latvia

Fair
Excellent
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,245,263 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Latvia.
Samoan Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $50,914, a difference of 27.8%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $61,422, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $51,555, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $64,298, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $51,737, a difference of 5.6%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
Income MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$50,914
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Exceptional
$114,826
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Exceptional
$93,602
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Exceptional
$51,555
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Exceptional
$61,422
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Exceptional
$43,099
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Fair
$51,737
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Exceptional
$105,522
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Exceptional
$111,454
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Exceptional
$64,298
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
26.7%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%), male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Exceptional
29.1%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 68.0%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.6%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
52.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
5.5%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 67.6%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
70.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
45.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
Disability MetricSamoanImmigrants from Latvia
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%