Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,154,914 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $50,914, a difference of 53.0%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $114,826, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $111,454, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,737, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $64,298, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 81.6%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 81.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 69.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 63.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.9%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 47.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.9%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 97.6%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 91.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%).