Immigrants from Uruguay vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,051,021 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 158.6 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $33,921, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $67,792, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $82,386, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $52,509, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $35,063, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 87.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 67.4%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 72.5%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.38%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.1%).