Immigrants from Fiji vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,508,958 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 35.7 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $67,792, a difference of 38.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $77,089, a difference of 34.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $81,750, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $35,063, a difference of 18.8%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $45,566, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 103.8%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 80.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 37.7%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 81.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 61.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 40.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.52, a difference of 1.8%), family households (68.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 98.2%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.090%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 98.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.7%).