Australian vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,777,025 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 91.8 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $33,921, a difference of 53.5%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $82,386, a difference of 43.8%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $67,792, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $46,417, a difference of 15.8%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,063, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 102.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 101.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 88.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.8%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 72.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.6%).