Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Sioux

Poor
Fair
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,801,317 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Sioux.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $33,921, a difference of 21.3%), median household income ($81,489 compared to $67,792, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($96,544 compared to $82,386, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $46,417, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $52,509, a difference of 11.7%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 66.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.7%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.9%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 55.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (42.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 64.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 39.8%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (87.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 11th grade (91.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaSioux
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Fair
2.5%