Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Sioux

Poor
Fair
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,229,405 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Sioux.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,709 compared to $33,921, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($80,722 compared to $67,792, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $46,417, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $52,509, a difference of 5.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $81,750, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $45,566, a difference of 13.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 70.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 55.2%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 54.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 38.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.7%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 155.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 104.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 21.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 80.4%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.7%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 113.4%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 50.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshSioux
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%