Lithuanian vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Sioux

Excellent
Fair
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,525,635 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Sioux.
Lithuanian Integration in Sioux Communities

Lithuanian vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $33,921, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $82,386, a difference of 40.1%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $67,792, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $46,417, a difference of 15.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $35,063, a difference of 20.1%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Income
Income MetricLithuanianSioux
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
24.3%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 120.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 119.7%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 38.2%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 41.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 52.8%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianSioux
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.8%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 89.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 78.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianSioux
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.9%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
78.0%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianSioux
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
41.0%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.2%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianSioux
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.0%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianSioux
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Lithuanian vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.3%).
Lithuanian vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianSioux
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%