Filipino vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,774,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $33,921, a difference of 74.1%), median household income ($115,509 compared to $67,792, a difference of 70.4%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $82,386, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 22.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $46,417, a difference of 24.4%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $35,063, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 138.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 132.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 127.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 50.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 57.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 107.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 92.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 31.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 84.5%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 80.6%), and births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.52, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 133.2%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 131.0%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 119.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.34%), 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 72.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.0%).