Lumbee vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,607,928 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $46,417, a difference of 34.2%), householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $52,509, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $77,089, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($36,876 compared to $39,448, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $35,063, a difference of 7.9%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $45,566, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and family poverty (17.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 42.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.1%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.2%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.2%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.6%).