Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Sioux
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Sioux
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,939,510 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 137.6 Sioux.
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $33,921, a difference of 36.2%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $67,792, a difference of 30.4%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $82,386, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $46,417, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,063, a difference of 15.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $33,921 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $82,386 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $67,792 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $39,448 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $45,566 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $35,063 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $46,417 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $77,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $81,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $52,509 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 83.8%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 78.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 36.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 28.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 26.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 31.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 38.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 88.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 79.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 78.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.7%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.52, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Tragic 41.5% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 41.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Exceptional 56.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.8%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 59.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 53.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 29.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Sioux Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Sioux |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 49.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 2.5% |