Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Sioux

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,372,023 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.931. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 200.1 Sioux.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $33,921, a difference of 32.8%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $67,792, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $82,386, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $46,417, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $35,063, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 76.2%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 74.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 37.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 78.5%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.17%), family households (62.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 55.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaSioux
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%