Pima vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Sioux

Poor
Fair
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,904,117 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.092% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 91.9 Sioux.
Pima Integration in Sioux Communities

Pima vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $81,750, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,417, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,063, a difference of 0.75%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,448, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $52,509, a difference of 3.9%).
Pima vs Sioux Income
Income MetricPimaSioux
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
24.3%

Pima vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.5%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Pima vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaSioux
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.8%

Pima vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and male unemployment (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Pima vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaSioux
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
7.9%

Pima vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Pima vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
78.0%

Pima vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Pima vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaSioux
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
41.0%

Pima vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Pima vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%

Pima vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Pima vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaSioux
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Pima vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.99%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Pima vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricPimaSioux
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.5%