Ecuadorian vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,759,085 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 23.5 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $33,921, a difference of 23.7%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $67,792, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $77,089, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $52,509, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $35,063, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 77.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 60.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 126.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 78.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.21%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.0%).