Arapaho vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,682,672 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 19.8 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $52,509, a difference of 13.1%), median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $35,063, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $45,566, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $67,792, a difference of 0.25%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $82,386, a difference of 0.39%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (24.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.41%), single male poverty (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 59.8%), and unemployment (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.3%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.52, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 0.14%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%).