Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Sioux

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,344,714 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.824% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 823.8 Sioux.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Sioux Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $45,566, a difference of 15.2%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $82,386, a difference of 14.1%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $33,921, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $46,417, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,063, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $52,509, a difference of 6.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and family poverty (20.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (21.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (24.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
16.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 75.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
7.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
78.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (3.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (36.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.52, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
41.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.6%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 31.8%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSioux
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.5%